The Things Worth Believing In

Tested by Reality. Guided by Ethics.

recent posts

  • The Fountain of Forgetfulness: Avoiding the Command Trap

    The Fountain of Forgetfulness: Avoiding the Command Trap

    In the professional world—especially in high-stakes fields like law enforcement, the military, or corporate leadership—there is a phenomenon we often see but rarely name. It’s the “stiffening” of the soul that happens when someone moves from the street to the office. We’ve seen solid operators get their gold bars or their corner offices, only to suddenly develop a strange case of amnesia.

    The 17th-century philosopher Balthazar Gracian captured this perfectly:

    “As you climb toward the throne of Command, on the very first step of success, you will come to a strange fountain where people try to slake the thirst of ambition. One of that fountain’s strange, contrary effects is that it makes us forget the past. I saw people drink from it and forget their former friends and acquaintances: witnesses to their former lowliness. They forgot even their brothers and sisters, and one drinker was such an arrogant barbarian that he did not recognize the father who engendered him, deleting from his memory all obligations, all favors received, wanting to be a creditor, not a debtor.

    Those who drank wanted to borrow, not to return. They forgot even themselves, and now that they were on the high seas, could barely remember that they had been spawned in puddles. They forgot all that could remind them of their dust and dung, all that would make them lower their feathers. They drank up ingratitude and affected gravity and remoteness, and wafted up strangely to their thrones, unable to recognize others, or recognize themselves. That is the way that honors change customs.”

    The Debt of Success

    Gracian points out that the ambitious person wants to be a “creditor, not a debtor.” They want to believe they reached the top entirely on their own merit. To admit they owe a debt to their former partners, their mentors, or even their “former lowliness” is a blow to their new, inflated sense of self.

    But the Long Haul isn’t a solo achievement. It’s a marathon run on the backs of those who helped us along the way. When a leader “deletes from his memory all obligations,” he loses the very thing that made him a leader in the first place: trust.

    “Spawned in Puddles”

    There is a specific type of arrogance that comes with rank—the belief that you were always meant for the “high seas” and that the “puddles” of the entry-level grind were beneath you.

    Gracian’s use of “dust and dung” is intentional. It’s the grit. It’s the messy, unglamorous reality of the job. If you forget the dust and dung, you lose the ability to lead the people who are currently standing in it. You become a leader who is always asking for more from your subordinates while offering nothing in return, because you no longer recognize their struggle as your own.

    The “Affected Gravity”

    The goal of this blog is to document the journey without losing the man. If “honors change customs,” then the challenge for the veteran practitioner is to remain unchanged by the trappings of status.

    • Recognize yourself: Don’t let the title define your character.
    • Recognize others: Remember that the person in the “puddle” today is the witness to who you used to be.
    • Lower your feathers: Stay humble enough to remember that you are made of the same “dust” as everyone else on the roster.

    Command is a duty to be performed, not a transformation into a “barbarian” who forgets his roots. The moment you stop recognizing the “father who engendered you”—the experiences and people that built you—is the moment you have failed the mission.

  • The Cinematic Myth: The Dirty Reality of Human Trafficking

    The Cinematic Myth: The Dirty Reality of Human Trafficking

    If you spend any time on social media or in certain “self-defense” circles, you’ve seen the alerts. Viral posts about “suspicious white vans” in Target parking lots, or warnings that middle-class girls are being snatched on their way to Starbucks to be shipped overseas in containers. It’s a scene straight out of the movie Taken.

    But having worked these cases—some of them alongside Federal agents from HSI—I can tell you that the cinematic version of trafficking is a distraction. It’s fear-mongering founded on an inaccurate portrayal of how this social epidemic actually functions.

    The “Taken” Fallacy

    In his book Protecting the Gift, Gavin De Becker notes that compared to a stranger kidnapping, a child is vastly more likely to have a heart attack—and child heart attacks are so rare most parents never even consider the risk.

    The “average woman” in a suburban parking lot is almost never the target of a sex slavery syndicate. Abduction is real, but it doesn’t look like Liam Neeson’s nightmares. When the media flashes statistics about “300,000 children at risk,” they often fail to mention that a massive percentage of that number involves non-custodial parent abductions—a tragedy, certainly, but a world away from the international sex trade.

    The Vulnerable, Not the “Likable”

    Real trafficking is uglier, more complicated, and far more heartbreaking than the movies. The victims don’t usually come from the “movie set” of suburbia. They come from an entirely different set of life circumstances: foster care, runaways, broken homes, and long histories of neglect or substance abuse.

    I’ve been in physical struggles with teenage girls picked up during prostitution stings—yelling, swearing, and fighting—when all we wanted was for them to talk to an agent. These aren’t always “sympathetic” or “likable” victims when you first encounter them. They are often dealing with behavioral issues and mental health struggles that make them incredibly difficult to help.

    The Illusion of Choice

    One of the hardest parts of these cases is that many victims will insist they are there “by choice.”

    By the time law enforcement encounters them, they have often been groomed and exploited for years. They’ve been conditioned so thoroughly that they truly believe they chose this path, without understanding what was actually done to them. It isn’t a simple “good guy vs. bad guy” story. It’s a slow-motion wreck where the victim has been taught to love the wreck.

    This is why these cases are a nightmare to prosecute. It takes long-term counseling with trained professionals just for a young woman to recognize she was victimized, let alone find the strength to testify against her trafficker.

    The Practitioner’s Responsibility

    We should be alert, prepared, and trained for any circumstance—absolutely. But we shouldn’t sell training or “safety” based on fear-mongering myths.

    Real trafficking isn’t cinematic. There are no SWAT raids at the end of the episode where everyone runs into each other’s arms. It’s a grind. It’s slow. And social media myths about white vans don’t help the people actually trapped in the cycle.

    If you want to protect your community, focus on the vulnerable, not the spectacle.

  • Tactical Preschool: The Risks of the Dynamic Entry

    Something unfortunately tends to fly out the window the second stress enters the equation: clear thinking.

    It seems like everyone in this industry studies, practices, and frankly, sometimes fantasizes about “dynamic entry” and building clearing. But often, the best tactical decision you can make is to slow the hell down and ask one simple question: Is this actually necessary?

    The Danger of the “Hunt”

    Going into a building after an armed, barricaded subject—or clearing your own home in the middle of the night—is arguably the most dangerous thing you will ever do. Before you cross that threshold, you need to articulate the necessity.

    • Is someone in immediate danger inside?
    • Is there a life-safety reason to move now?

    If the subject is armed, alone, and not ready to surrender, what is the hurry? If you “go dynamic” and someone gets killed, how are you going to explain that decision? “I wanted to get it over with” isn’t an entry in the playbook of a professional.

    The Home Defense Blueprint

    This applies to the “Domestic Arena” too. If you and your wife are in the bedroom and you know an intruder is in the house, there is almost zero reason to go out looking for them.

    The Strategy:

    1. Arm yourself.
    2. Call 911.
    3. Bunker down in a defensible position.
    4. Announce loudly that you are armed and the police are on the way.

    Hunting a shadow in your hallway is a coin toss where the stakes are your life. Don’t take the bet if you don’t have to.

    Limited Entry and Communication

    In a lone-gunman barricade, the goal is contact and negotiation. If that fails, you don’t have to go “full SWAT” immediately. You can utilize Limited Entry.

    Limited entry allows you to clear what you can see without committing your entire body to a room you haven’t “vetted” yet. You aren’t clearing the structure; you are locating the subject.

    Furthermore, “stealth” is often overvalued. I’ve seen officers try to “stealth clear” when the better option was to stand in a covered position outside and call the subject out. Even if the reply is a “F#$K YOU!”, you’ve achieved a tactical win: you now know exactly where he is without putting a single boot inside the kill zone.

    Flexibility is the Standard

    If a subject manages to wound a good guy, “going dynamic” to finish the fight isn’t always the answer—often, it just results in more casualties. Evacuate the wounded and reset the situation.

    Every incident is different. You have to be flexible. Don’t let a “cool” tactic you saw in a movie dictate a response that gets you or your partners killed.

    Slow down. Think. Articulate the necessity. Then move—if you have to.

  • The Paradox of the Pedestal: The “Catch-22” of the Badge

    The Paradox of the Pedestal: The “Catch-22” of the Badge

    I was scrolling through the local news recently and saw a familiar headline: an off-duty officer arrested by another agency for a DWI. As expected, the comment section was an immediate dumpster fire.

    “Bet he gets off.” “Good. They should be treated like everybody else.” “They should be held to a higher standard.”

    It’s a classic Catch-22. The public wants us to be “treated just like anybody else” while simultaneously demanding we be treated differently—held to a “higher standard”—because of the job. You can’t have it both ways.

    The News Cycle Spectacle

    Let’s be clear: anyone who breaks the law should face the consequences. That is the only way the system works. But if you think every doctor, lawyer, or nurse who gets a DWI has their name and profession paraded through the local news, you’re mistaken.

    When a cop gets arrested, it isn’t just news; it’s a spectacle. Unless a department or a disgruntled party has a specific interest in calling the press, 99% of arrests never hit a major outlet. But for the LEO, “transparency” often becomes a euphemism for public shaming. If we are truly being treated “like anyone else,” why does the badge make the mugshot front-page news?

    The Discretion Dilemma

    Discretion is the grease in the gears of the justice system. I’ve let plenty of people go with warnings for minor V&T stuff. I’ve allowed that joint to get ground up and tossed in the gutter rather than making an arrest—all within the bounds of the law.

    Should we treat cops with the same discretion we show your daughter or the local factory worker? That’s a sticky question.

    • If I give a pass to a civilian, it’s “community policing.”
    • If I give a pass to a peer, it’s “The Blue Wall.”

    If I can give your kid a break for a one-day expired registration, I shouldn’t be given grief for giving an officer the same warning. However, if you find yourself giving passes for things you would never overlook for a non-LEO, that’s a sign of a deep-seated problem.

    “Bet He Gets Off”

    This is the most common refrain, and it usually stems from a misunderstanding of how the machine works. When a first-time offender (who happens to be a cop) gets a standard plea deal—like probation or a reduction to an impaired charge—the public screams “Cover-up!”

    In reality, that is being treated like everyone else. If a plumber gets that deal, it’s standard procedure. The “Higher Standard” crowd often isn’t asking for equality; they are asking for the cop to be hit harder by the legal system specifically because of the badge.

    The Internal Standard

    As LEOs, we must hold ourselves to a higher standard. We are representatives of the system, and the public trust is the only currency we have. But we need to separate the Legal System from the Professional Code.

    1. Legally: An officer should be treated exactly like the plumber. No better, no worse.
    2. Professionally: This is where the higher standard lives. The plumber keeps his wrench; the cop might lose his badge.

    If we are going to be consistent, we should stop airing non-felony arrests simply because it looks “transparent.” Fairness isn’t about being hit harder by the courts; it’s about the law being applied blindly, while the Department handles the “honor” side of the house.

    Let’s set aside the personal grudges and the “I remember when I was stopped” stories. If we want a professional force, we have to treat them like professionals—and that means consistent expectations, not a moving target.

  • The Deployment Without End: The Myth of the “Poorly Trained” Cop

    The Deployment Without End: The Myth of the “Poorly Trained” Cop

    A common refrain from critics of American policing is how “poorly trained” we are. They point at European academies that last years or compare us to elite military units. They see a six-month academy and assume that’s the end of the road.

    As someone who has spent 26 years in the job—and managed the logistics of those resources—I can tell you that these comparisons miss the entire landscape of operational reality.

    The Military Model vs. the 24/7 Deployment

    People love the Tier-1 military model as a benchmark. But they forget how the military operates: Training is the job until you are deployed. You train, you prep, you deploy for a window, and then you rotate back to the states to train again.

    Law Enforcement is a deployment that never ends. We are “deployed” 24/7/365. There is no rotation back to a training base. In LE, it’s work, work, work—and then you try to squeeze in training without shattering the overtime budget or leaving the streets so thin that nobody is left to answer the radio. We are like a unit in the field trying to conduct “field training” between missions that never stop.

    The Professional Double Standard

    Consider the analogies people use for other high-stakes professions:

    • The NFL: Do we expect football players to go through an “academy,” then play at NFL standards for the rest of their careers with no physical conditioning or practice? Of course not. They spend the vast majority of their time practicing for a sixty-minute game.
    • The Military: Do soldiers have to pay for their own ammunition to stay proficient? No. The taxpayer understands that lethality requires funded repetition.
    • Medical Professionals: We respect nurses for their education, but does a nurse have to know how to shoot, drive an emergency vehicle at high speeds, and wrestle a violent subject into handcuffs—all while staying current on the latest ever-changing case law—based solely on their initial schooling?

    The expectation of “perfection” placed on an officer is absolute, yet the resources provided to maintain that perfection are often an afterthought.

    The “Total Officer” Skill Set

    The public often fixates on “unarmed combatives” or Jiu-Jitsu as the magic fix. While those are vital, they are a fraction of the requirement. An officer must be proficient in:

    • Emergency Vehicle Operations: Statistically the most dangerous part of the job for us—and for you. It is also the most expensive and time-consuming to train.
    • First Aid/Trauma Care: Being a first-responder often means being a medic before the ambulance arrives.
    • Legal Updates: Navigating the minefield of civil rights and changing legislation in real-time.
    • Firearms and Fitness: Perishable skills that degrade the moment they aren’t practiced.

    The Real Solution (and the Real Bill)

    If the public actually wanted “elite” policing, the solution is manpower. We should be treated like the military: officers should be training at least one-quarter of the year to maintain the standards expected of them.

    But here is the hard truth: You all expect professional performance at a cut-rate tax payment. It’s easy to demand a higher caliber of officer; it’s much harder to vote for the tax bill required to pull a third of your police force off the road for constant, high-level training. Until the public is willing to fund the “Practice,” they are essentially asking us to maintain a “Storybook” standard in a “Paperback” reality.

  • The Company You Keep: Tactical Social Geometry

    The Company You Keep: Tactical Social Geometry

    “A person’s good and evil are dependent on his companions. When three people are together there will always be an exemplary person among them… choice the good person and follow his example.” — Hojo Nagauji (1432-1519 A.D.)

    Hojo Nagauji was a “Fighting Samurai” and a general who helped lay the foundations of what we now call Bushido. In his Twenty-One Precepts, he warned his retainers to be surgical about their associations. He wasn’t just being a prude; he was talking about survivability.

    The “Screw Golf” Mentality

    Nagauji’s advice to avoid “gaming and carousing” in favor of study and calligraphy echoes a sentiment I’ve long admired from Col. Dave Grossman: “Screw golf.” If you claim to be a “professional” or a “warrior,” yet you spend more heart and mind on idle drinking, gaming, or status-seeking than on your skills and your soul, you are living in a fantasy. You are choosing to say you are something rather than actually being it.

    The Perimeter of Reputation

    We’ve all been there—out with friends, one too many drinks, acting in a way that doesn’t align with the weight of the badge or the belt. While “playing” is better than wasting time completely, it must be done intentionally. As George Washington famously noted: “Associate yourself with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation. It is better to be alone than in bad company.”

    In the “Domestic Arena,” I recently wrote about protecting the marriage from the “poison” of bitter influences. The same applies to your professional and martial life. If you associate with people who consistently act in an undignified manner, you are debasing yourself. You are asking for trouble that “The Way” is designed to help you avoid.

    The Exemplary Person

    Nagauji suggests a simple exercise in situational awareness: In any group of three, find the “good example” and emulate him. Look at the “bad example” and use him as a mirror to correct your own faults.

    This is Tactical Social Geometry. You are positioning yourself to inherit the virtues of those around you, rather than being dragged down by their gravity.

    Are You Worthy of Respect?

    If you find yourself getting “wasted” as routine entertainment or associating with those who have no respect for the Standard, you are moving away from the path. A warrior is mindful. He doesn’t stumble into trouble; he sees it coming and chooses a different route—or he meets it on his own terms.

    Mindfulness is the fundamental. Consider the people you associate with today:

    • Are they examples you wish to emulate?
    • Do you want others to think of you the way they think of them?
    • Are they worthy of respect?
    • Are you?

  • Tactical Preschool: The Art of the Flank

    Note from the Author: Years ago, I started a series called “Tactical Preschool.” The premise was simple: most people fail not because they don’t know “advanced techniques,” but because they haven’t mastered the fundamentals. Digging through my old notebooks, I found these doodles from 2009. They are as relevant today as they were then.

    Fundamentals Over “Advanced” Noise

    I have always been a believer in fundamentals over “advanced technique.” In the real world—where the lighting is bad, your heart rate is 160, and someone is actively trying to hurt you—complex motor skills disappear. What remains are the basics.

    If you apply the fundamentals consistently and accomplish them faster than your opponent can process, you will typically win. It’s about shortening your OODA loop while stretching theirs.

    The Lesson: Don’t Slug it Out

    When confronted with superior numbers, the natural (and wrong) instinct is to stay put and try to out-slug everyone simultaneously. This is a recipe for a “static” disaster.

    If you have to fight because fleeing isn’t an option, you must move. These sketches illustrate the basic flanking maneuver:

    1. Displace to the Flank Do not stay in the “kill zone” where everyone can see you and hit you at once. Displace to one of the opponent’s flanks. This forces them to “re-index” on your new position.

    2. The “Hombre a Hombre” Principle By moving to the flank, you isolate one opponent. You turn a “everyone vs. me” situation into a series of “one-on-one” engagements. You deal with him hombre a hombre.

    3. The Buddy Factor If you have partners, two-on-one is even better. If the opponent’s buddy tries to help, he now has his own man caught in the crossfire. If you are lucky, the second bad guy won’t even realize you’ve moved until his partner is already out of the fight.

    4. Rolling up the Line If you have enough “buddies” to keep the other threats occupied, you can roll up the flank and take out the opponents one at a time. This is the essence of tactical geometry.

    The Preschool Graduation Requirement

    “Tactical Preschool” isn’t about being basic; it’s about being brilliant at the basics.

    Before you buy the latest optic, attend the “tier-one” carbine course, or learn the newest “operator” transition, ask yourself: Can I move and change the angle under stress? Do I understand the geometry of the room? Am I faster than his ability to process my movement?

    If the answer is no, stay in preschool. The fundamentals are where the lives are saved.

    The “Preschool” Checklist

    • Movement: Are you moving to cover or moving to change the angle?
    • Isolation: How are you turning a group threat into a series of individual problems?
    • Processing: Are you doing it fast enough to break the opponent’s OODA loop?
  • The Library and the Sword: A Lifelong Quest for the Standard

    The Library and the Sword: A Lifelong Quest for the Standard

    As a young child, I was told I wasn’t a “reader.” It’s a label that seems impossible to me now, but at the time, it was a definition I nearly accepted. That changed in a small-town library when I pulled a copy of The Hobbit off the shelf.

    I didn’t just find a story; I found a feeling I would spend the rest of my life trying to replicate. As I matured, that feeling evolved into a deep fascination with the man behind the myth—J.R.R. Tolkien—and the profound Catholic faith that acted as the bedrock for his world.

    Tolkien didn’t just write “fantasy.” He wrote about the weight of manhood, the intoxicating nature of power, and the grueling path of redemption. I eventually carried The Lord of the Rings with me on military deployment, reading about the “Northern Courage” of men facing impossible shadows while standing in the reality of my own service.

    In that intersection of faith and duty, two characters have always stood as the ultimate study for the modern practitioner: Boromir and Faramir.

    The Two Pillars: Hardiness vs. Wisdom

    Faramir and Boromir represent the two halves of the “Protector” archetype.

    Boromir was “proud and fearless, often rash, ever anxious for the victory… and his own glory therein.” He was a man of immense “hardiness”—physical and tactical prowess that was undeniable. But his flaw was hubris. He believed his strength was a sufficient shield against the darkness. He didn’t just want Gondor to win; he wanted to be the hero who made it happen.

    Faramir, by contrast, possessed Detachment. He was “wise enough to know that there are some perils from which a man must flee.” He understood that the greatest threat wasn’t the enemy outside the walls, but the pride within them. When he said he wouldn’t take the Ring if he found it on the highway, he wasn’t boasting; he was acknowledging a vow that held him.

    The Anatomy of the Fall

    The Ring did not tempt Boromir with evil. It tempted him with his own Duty. It used his desire to save his people as a hook, then snagged his ego to set the barb.

    When Boromir attempted to take the Ring from Frodo, he experienced a total systemic failure. He violated the Code of the “Truth-speaker.” For a man of Gondor, whose word was meant to be a structural component of his soul, this wasn’t just a lapse in judgment—it was a spiritual rupture.

    The Redemptive Podvig

    The moment the “madness” passed, Boromir realized the wreckage of his honor. He was left with a choice: retreat in shame or engage in a Podvig—the spiritual struggle to “turn around” and return to the correct path.

    He chose the latter. His last stand at Amon Hen is one of the most profound moments of redemption in literature because it was solitary.

    Boromir had every reason to believe that if he died there, defending two “halflings” against an unbeatable horde, his deeds would never be known. There would be no songs for a man who died in a nameless forest. He was sacrificing the one thing he loved more than Gondor: his reputation.

    In that forest, Boromir finally triumphed over the Ring—not by his “hardiness,” but by his sacrifice. He died with a smile because he had finally conquered his hubris.

    The Lesson for the Practitioner

    From that small library in a quiet town to the dust of a deployment, Tolkien’s message has remained my North Star: We are truth-speakers. We boast seldom, and then perform, or die in the attempt.

    We live in a world that prioritizes the “Song”—the branding and the public accolades. But the true Podvig of the professional happens in the moments no one sees. It is the quiet decision to hold a line when there is no audience.

    Like Boromir, we are flawed. We will encounter our own versions of the Ring—temptations to use our power for our own glory. The question is: when the madness passes, do we have the courage to find our own Amon Hen? Do we have the strength to let the Ego die so the Soul can live?

  • The Podvig: Sunday’s Spiritual Struggle

    The Podvig: Sunday’s Spiritual Struggle

    Note from the Author: Years ago, I came across a word that redefined how I view training and duty. Today, returning from the Latin Mass and preparing for another week of the 14-week Murph cycle, that word—Podvig—is the only one that fits.

    In David L. Robbins’ Last Citadel, he describes a night attack by the “Night Witches,” where a young pilot recalls her father’s teaching: “Once in a while your soul wants to see a podvig, a feat, to prove you’re alive.”

    The word Podvig doesn’t translate easily into English. While some render it as “glory” or “exploit,” its roots in Eastern Orthodoxy and the broader Catholic tradition run much deeper. It defines a spiritual struggle—the ascetic discipline undertaken to purify oneself from the passions that draw us away from God.

    The Internal Battle

    St. Paul captured the essence of the podvig when he wrote: “I fail to carry out the things I want to do, and I find myself doing the very things I hate.” A podvig is the intentional “turning around” to get back onto the correct path. It is the decision to oppose the body when it draws us toward sloth or ego.

    • Do I eat too much? The podvig is fasting.
    • Am I lazy? The podvig is harder labor.
    • Do I want to stay in bed? The podvig is rising early for prayer.

    The Martial Parallel

    There are undeniable parallels between the podvig and the martial lifestyle. The “Warrior Path” is not about vanity; it is about sacrifice. If a practitioner realizes they are out of shape, they must take on the podvig of physical conditioning. If they find themselves slacking in their craft, they take on the podvig of training.

    But there is a trap. The desert fathers warned that one can become “prideful and vain-glorious” over their own podvig. This is the danger for the athlete and the officer alike. Do you train for your ego, or for something deeper? Do you wear the uniform to be seen, or to serve a standard that exists outside of yourself?

    The Sunday Recalibration

    In the traditional liturgy, we see the ultimate podvig: the subjection of the self to the Divine Order. It reminds us that our training—whether it’s a weighted vest on Monday or a 46er ascent—is meaningless if it isn’t directed toward a higher purpose.

    We don’t seek the “feat” to prove we are better than others. We seek the podvig to prove to our own souls that we are still alive, still disciplined, and still under Command.

  • The Pursuits of the Mind: Why We Embrace the Suck

    The Pursuits of the Mind: Why We Embrace the Suck

    Note from the Author: In 2010, I wrote about a foot pursuit that fundamentally changed how I viewed fitness. Today, as I grind through my 14-week Murph cycle in my 50s, those lessons are more relevant than ever. This is a reflection on the intersection of the body and the mind—and why the hardest workouts aren’t about the muscles, but the will.

    The Reality of the Street

    Before I became a police officer, I used to watch reality TV shows and wonder why so many cops seemed out of shape. I’d watch a suspect vault a fence like it wasn’t there while the officer struggled to keep up.

    A few months after finishing field training, reality hit me. My partner and I located a stolen car in a housing complex, and the chase was on. After a 100-yard sprint and two 6-foot chain-link fences, I was bleeding from both palms and had sliced the back of my leg. My legs felt like rubber.

    I learned two things that day that aren’t taught in a standard gym:

    1. Gear changes everything: Running in boots, a vest, and a duty belt is a different world than “jogging” in shorts.
    2. Energy systems matter: The sprint-and-climb exertion of a pursuit taps into different systems than a steady 5K.

    I caught my guy—mostly because my “wind” lasted one second longer than his—but I didn’t “win” the fight as much as I just fell on him and got the cuffs on. My fitness goals changed that afternoon. I realized I didn’t need a beach body; I needed a stress-inoculated body.

    Beyond the Physical: Embracing the Suck

    There is a term used by soldiers to describe dealing with a nightmare situation: “Embrace the Suck.” It means the situation is bad, but you put your head down and drive on.

    As Mark Rippetoe famously said, “Strong people are harder to kill than weak people and more useful in general.” I agree 100%, but I believe the real benefit of intense exercise is mental development rather than physical results. Size and genetics have limits, but the space between your ears is a level playing field.

    Intense exercise—the type that makes your internal dialogue scream, “This sucks, just stop, just quit”—is where you sow the seeds you will reap later when you are fighting for your life. When both you and your opponent approach the “quitting point,” the one who has practiced pushing through that threshold in training is the one who goes home.

    The Standard of 2026

    Military trainers have known this forever. Basic training isn’t just about “whipping recruits into shape”; it’s about showing them they can push beyond self-imposed limitations.

    This is why I gravitate toward high-intensity protocols like CrossFit, maximal effort lifts (squats, deadlifts, presses), and the grueling 14-week Murph cycle I am currently executing. It’s why I pushed for my Adirondack 46er status. Whether it’s 100 burpees or a 4,000-foot ascent, the goal is the same: Stress Inoculation.

    If you are comfortable in your workout, you are likely coasting. To truly benefit, you have to find that “lungs burning, gonna die” moment on occasion. You have to change things up. If you hate running, run. If you hate lifting, lift.

    The Bottom Line

    Training hard isn’t about cosmetic improvements. It’s about building a mental toughness that translates directly to the street, the trail, and the challenges of leadership.

    Get out there and embrace the suck. It might be the best decision of your life. It could also be the one that saves it.

    Questions for the Practitioner

    1. The Threshold: When was the last time your internal dialogue told you to quit, and you chose to ignore it?
    2. The Gear: Do you ever train with the weight you actually carry in the field?
    3. The Comfort Trap: What part of your current fitness program have you put on “autopilot,” and how will you disrupt it this week?