If I had a dollar for every time someone yelled, “That’s entrapment!” during an arrest, I could have retired a decade ago. It’s a favorite line of the “jailhouse lawyer,” and while they might actually be back on the street tomorrow, it won’t be because the police “entrapped” them.
In the age of viral videos and armchair legal experts, the word “entrapment” has been twisted to mean “the police tricked me into getting caught.” But in the eyes of the law, being duped and being entrapped are two very different things.
The Legal Definition
While every state has slightly different statutes, the general definition is this: Entrapment is a practice whereby a law enforcement agent induces a person to commit a criminal offense that the person would have otherwise been unlikely or unwilling to commit.
The key word there is induces.
The “Bike” Test: Opportunity vs. Persuasion
Let’s look at a simple example to illustrate the difference:
- Scenario A (Opportunity): I lean an unlocked, expensive mountain bike against a street corner and sit in an unmarked car across the street. You walk by, see the bike, and decide to swipe it. I arrest you. Verdict: Not Entrapment. I provided the opportunity, but the intent was entirely yours.
- Scenario B (Inducement): I point at that same bike and say to a passerby, “Hey, I’ll give you $200 right now if you just grab that bike and bring it to me. It belongs to a guy who owes me money.” If you take the bike and I arrest you… Verdict: Entrapment. I persuaded or coerced you into committing a crime you had no prior intention of committing.
The “Undercover” Myth
One of the most persistent myths—likely fueled by bad TV—is that an undercover cop must identify themselves as law enforcement if asked.
Let’s be clear: That is 100% false. If you ask an undercover officer, “Are you a cop?” and they say “No,” they aren’t entrapping you. They are performing their duties. Entrapment does not mean you were tricked into getting caught committing a crime you wanted to commit; it means you were forced or convinced to commit a crime you didn’t want to commit.
Speed Traps and “Dukes of Hazzard” Tactics
People often call a hidden patrol car a “speed trap” and claim entrapment. It isn’t. The speed limit sign is the warning, and your foot on the gas is the intent.
Unless I’m pulling a Dukes of Hazzard move—where I have a motorized speed limit sign that flips from 70 MPH to 30 MPH the second you drive past—you aren’t being entrapped. You’re just speeding.
The Vice Perspective: Intent vs. Opportunity
In the world of Narcotics and Vice, the line is very clear. If you walk into a room intended to buy drugs or exchange sex for money, you aren’t being entrapped. You just didn’t intend to get caught.
You have no Constitutional right to not get caught.
When the police run an undercover operation, we are providing the “opportunity” for a criminal act to take place. We are not convincing a law-abiding citizen to suddenly become a drug dealer. If the “criminal design” originated in your head before we ever spoke to you, you’re going to have a very hard time winning an entrapment defense in court.
The Takeaway
Don’t confuse “good police work” with “illegal inducement.” If you choose to break the law, the police are allowed to be clever, they are allowed to be undercover, and they are allowed to wait for you to make your move.
Stay on the right side of the line, and you won’t have to worry about the definition.
Leave a comment